Gold’s 2021 Price Rises on Firm Footing

Gold's 2021 Price Rise on Firm Footing

The flow of institutional gold in November may have caused some market watchers to reminisce of gold’s run between 2008 and 2013, one that saw the yellow metal reach a new all-time high in 2011 before a fairly sharp decline. After a lengthy absence, institutions jumped into the gold market with record purchases this year due to unprecedented uncertainty, only to reduce their holdings by a substantial margin on what looks to be improved sentiment (the release of a COVID-19 vaccine and an anticipated surge in customer spending).

Yet little has changed in terms of gold’s fundamentals and, as Friday’s trading session showed, in terms of gold’s price movement. Despite the large institutional outflows, gold hit a high of $1,890 on Friday, not too far off from the $2,070 peak set in August. According to State Street Global Advisors’ George Milling-Stanley, there aren’t too many reasons to compare gold’s current run to that of a decade prior, aside from the bullish prospects themselves.

Why is gold’s bull run different this time?

In a web seminar hosted by the firm, the chief gold strategist elaborated upon the differences between the two bull runs and why gold investors have more cause for optimism than concern heading into 2021. Milling-Stanley described gold’s last run as frothy in regards to investors chasing gains, though he nonetheless noted that it helped establish a new price range for gold, moving the metal from around $250 to $1,000.

Adam Perlaky, manager of investment research at the World Gold Council who also participated in the seminar, outlined a key point to look out for when anticipating gold’s movement over the coming years. Previously, portfolio managers have held steadfastly to the 60/40 stock/bond allocation while paying minimal attention to gold.

The safety that bonds once offered, however, is now highly questionable at best if not gone altogether. Sovereign bonds around the world are now yielding zero to negative interest, and with increasingly loose monetary policies accompanied by debasement of fiat currencies and mounting debt, the bond market is only expected to worsen. We simply can’t expect government bonds to keep pace with inflation in this interest rate environment.

Gold shines brightest at 10% allocation

This ties into Milling-Stanley’s separation of gold’s current bull run to that of 2011, as gold began truly gaining traction last year long before the pandemic was even mentioned, being given a massive push by worldwide slicing of interest rates and a subsequent dearth of safe-haven assets.

Whereas most institutions previously held a 1%-2% gold portfolio allocation at most, analysts are now expecting fund managers to increase this allocation to 4%-5%. Milling-Stanley believes institutions could look to increase their portfolio allocation to gold to as high as 10% in what will turn out to be a broad reassessment of hedging. According to State Street’s research, a 10% allocation to gold offers the optimum advantage against inflation risk and market volatility while still showing the greatest returns.

Needless to say, even the more conservative prediction of a +2%-3% increase in institutional gold holdings bodes extremely well for gold prices considering the trillions of dollars of investment capital involved.

While both experts note that vaccine developments have given way to some risk-on sentiment, the latter is expected to remain subdued considering the broader economic picture. Perlaky notes that the global economy has never encountered anything resembling this year’s pandemic, the full effects of which are still to be revealed.

To Milling-Stanley, gold’s pullback from August’s levels represents a healthy correction from what were at the time perhaps overbought levels. This should help the metal better prepare for the next leg of a lengthy bull run that could see it push to $2,300 sometime next year.

Despite Comparisons, Gold and Bitcoin “Fundamentally Different” Stores of Value

Despite Comparisons, Gold and Bitcoin Fundamentally Different Stores of Value
Freepik images

Both gold and Bitcoin offer a way for savers to preserve wealth from inflation. Despite the recent Bitcoin frenzy that generated many comparisons between Bitcoin and gold, see why only one of these assets lets its owners sleep well…

The unprecedented levels of panic and uncertainty this year have brought forth a push for safe-haven assets that is likewise difficult to match. Gold posted consecutive all-time highs, pulling other precious metals along the way, as it climbed to $2,070 in August amid risk aversion and red flags from all corners.

The drive to find a safe-haven to not only store wealth but also protect one from various downturns has also reinvigorated the cryptocurrency market, bringing Bitcoin not too far off from its peak of nearly $20,000, last seen in December 2017. Three years ago, the comparisons with Bitcoin and gold were just as present as today. Writing on FoxBusiness, Jonathan Garber speaks with many analysts who argue that both assets hold no counterparty risk and offer investors a unique diversification opportunity.

Gold and Bitcoin “fundamentally different”

Yet as tempting as it may be to compare the two, they remain fundamentally different and will continue to fulfill different roles. As Peter Schiff, CEO of Euro Pacific Capital notes, Bitcoin’s primary purpose remains that of a currency, or rather an alternative to fiat ones. The token was created in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis to offer people a method of exchange that would be free from money printing and other forms of central bank manipulation.

Although many have since grown to view it as a store of value, Schiff points out that Bitcoin remains fundamentally tied to its currency status. Unlike gold, it doesn’t play an important part in jewelry and manufacturing, and its flexibility and utility are largely tied to the virtual sphere. In contrast, gold requires no internet connection or validation to either be used as payment, purchased or traded.

Ray Dalio, founder of the $98.9 billion Bridgewater Associates fund whose frequent outperformance has much to do with its big bets on gold, also hesitates to make comparisons between the two assets. In a recent tweet, Dalio highlighted Bitcoin’s infamous volatility and said that it makes the case for the token’s preservation of purchasing power more difficult to make.

Bitcoin’s volatility vs. gold’s stability

Bitcoin’s price swings may have brought gains to many, but its tendency to have abrupt downturns has caused just as much worry. While the top crypto has posted a nearly full recovery from its 2018 low of $3,200, such falls have and continue to trouble investors with a long-term outlook.

On the other hand, gold’s stability has always been one of its hallmarks, if not the most important one. Whereas 10% oscillations in the price of Bitcoin are a frequent overnight phenomenon, gold is exceptionally resilient to sharp downturns, yet also able to post massive gains during times of crisis. Even in its most bearish periods, gold continues to be an asset no investor would mind owning. Particularly in the case of physical gold, one can liquidate the asset at any moment and in any corner of the world without issue and receive most of their initial investment, if not more. This has been the case for centuries, and it’s difficult to envision a different scenario.

With a little over a decade under its belt, Bitcoin has plenty of miles to walk before it can offer its holders anything close to the sense of safety and security that gold does.